Comments on: Misconception: If we only didn’t fight the *EXPLETIVE* war in Iraq, we could have had enough money for *YOUR FAVORITE SOCIAL SPENDING ITEM*. http://socialismdoesntwork.com/misconception-if-we-only-didnt-fight-the-expletive-war-in-iraq-we-could-have-had-enough-money-for-your-favorite-social-spending-item/ Why Socialims Leads to MORE Poverty, Inequality, and Injustice. Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:50:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Capitalist in Chief http://socialismdoesntwork.com/misconception-if-we-only-didnt-fight-the-expletive-war-in-iraq-we-could-have-had-enough-money-for-your-favorite-social-spending-item/comment-page-1/#comment-45 Capitalist in Chief Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:17:59 +0000 http://socialismdoesntwork.com/?p=817#comment-45 Since last year, and the year before, and before, etc. we already did spend it on the war in Iraq AND something else. Did you complain about the Iraq war preventing something from being spent on last year? Then why are you still complaining this year? We're spending way more money now than we did last year. Still not enough? Just wait until next year, we'll be spending even more then. Will you be still complaining? Do I have to say it again? The money spent on Iraq won't disappear if it's not spent, but despite that, pick any government program, the Iraq war is not preventing any money from being spent on it. It's called borrowing. Our current $2 trillion deficit is strong proof of that. And whenever I make zero sense, it's because you have zero comprehension. Since last year, and the year before, and before, etc. we already did spend it on the war in Iraq AND something else. Did you complain about the Iraq war preventing something from being spent on last year? Then why are you still complaining this year? We’re spending way more money now than we did last year. Still not enough? Just wait until next year, we’ll be spending even more then. Will you be still complaining?

Do I have to say it again? The money spent on Iraq won’t disappear if it’s not spent, but despite that, pick any government program, the Iraq war is not preventing any money from being spent on it. It’s called borrowing. Our current $2 trillion deficit is strong proof of that.

And whenever I make zero sense, it’s because you have zero comprehension.

]]> By: lolwut http://socialismdoesntwork.com/misconception-if-we-only-didnt-fight-the-expletive-war-in-iraq-we-could-have-had-enough-money-for-your-favorite-social-spending-item/comment-page-1/#comment-43 lolwut Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:59:34 +0000 http://socialismdoesntwork.com/?p=817#comment-43 Wow, congratulations on making zero sense. That's 80 billion that could be spent somewhere else. Not saying spending it on the war is a bad thing, but 80 billion is 80 billion, it wouldn't suddenly disappear without the war. Wow, congratulations on making zero sense. That’s 80 billion that could be spent somewhere else. Not saying spending it on the war is a bad thing, but 80 billion is 80 billion, it wouldn’t suddenly disappear without the war.

]]> By: Phillip Branham http://socialismdoesntwork.com/misconception-if-we-only-didnt-fight-the-expletive-war-in-iraq-we-could-have-had-enough-money-for-your-favorite-social-spending-item/comment-page-1/#comment-31 Phillip Branham Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:46:33 +0000 http://socialismdoesntwork.com/?p=817#comment-31 Find a tea party where you live and join the march on Wishington. Mine is www.charlestonteaparty.org Find a tea party where you live and join the march on Wishington. Mine is http://www.charlestonteaparty.org

]]> By: Mike Cunningham Sr http://socialismdoesntwork.com/misconception-if-we-only-didnt-fight-the-expletive-war-in-iraq-we-could-have-had-enough-money-for-your-favorite-social-spending-item/comment-page-1/#comment-30 Mike Cunningham Sr Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:48:59 +0000 http://socialismdoesntwork.com/?p=817#comment-30 Thank you, thank you, thank you, Thank you, thank you, thank you,

]]>